Plato,
in the “Timaeus,” says that when one of the wisest men of Greece, the
statesman Solon, visited Egypt, he was told by an old priest that the
Greeks were like mere children because they possessed no truly ancient
traditions or notions “gray with time.” In Egypt, the priest continued
proudly, “there is nothing great or beautiful or remarkable that is done
here, or in your country, or in any other land that has not been long
since put into writing and preserved in our temples.”
Such
colossal ambition coalesced under the Ptolemaic dynasty. In the third
century B.C., more than half a century after Plato wrote his dialogues,
the kings ordered that every book in the known world be collected and
placed in the great library they had founded in Alexandria. Hardly
anything is known of it except its fame: neither its site (it was
perhaps a section of the House of the Muses) nor how it was used, nor
even how it came to its end. Yet, as one of history’s most distinguished
ghosts, the Library of Alexandria became the archetype of all
libraries.
Libraries
come in countless shapes and sizes. They can be like the Library of
Congress or as modest as that of the children’s concentration camp in
Auschwitz-Birkenau, where the older girls were in charge of eight
volumes that had to be hidden every night so that the Nazi guards
wouldn’t confiscate them. They can be built from books found in the
garbage, like the Yiddish Book Center in Amherst, Mass., set up in 1980
by the 24-year-old Aaron Lansky from volumes discarded by the younger
generations who no longer spoke the tongue of their elders, or they can
be catalogued in the mind of their exiled readers, in the hope of
resurrection, like the libraries plundered by the Israeli soldiers in
the occupied territories of Palestine. It is in the nature of libraries
to adapt to changing circumstances and threats, and all libraries exist
in constant danger of being destroyed by war, vermin, fire, water or the
idiocies of bureaucracy.
But
today, the principal danger facing libraries comes not from threats
like these but from ill-considered changes that may cause libraries to
lose their defining triple role: as preservers of the memory of our
society, as providers of the accounts of our experience and the tools to
navigate them — and as symbols of our identity.
The rest of the article can be read here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/24/opinion/reinventing-the-library.html?emc=eta1&_r=0
No comments:
Post a Comment