Wednesday, July 11, 2018

Fairfax Library System Treats Friends Groups Unfairly


https://www.insidenova.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/letter-fairfax-library-system-treats-friends-groups-unfairly/article_a0f58994-84f0-11e8-8939-4b1fa7967c54.html

Editor: Thank you for your June 28 article [“Revised Library Requirements Irritating Some ‘Friends’ Groups”].
The story is not accurate in that neither the Tysons Library Friends or Reston Library Friends are “refusing” to sign the library’s memorandum of understanding (MOU). The deadline for signing the MOU has not passed and no final decisions have been made by either group.
Nor are the Tysons and Reston library Friends the only groups who take issue with the MOU. Several other library Friends groups also have serious concerns, and are weighing whether to sign.

Library Friends continue to seek compromise and cooperation rather than the heavy-handed, unilateral approach the county government has consistently pursued toward us.

Charles Keener, Oakton







Tuesday, July 3, 2018

Statement from Dennis Hays Regarding Library MOU


It is our belief that the County is looking to control the finances of the Friends, dictating where the money we raise goes.  A couple of points:  As 501(c)3 organizations will are required to annually file a variety of state and federal financial forms that list income, donations, assets, expenditures, etc.  
These are public documents available to anyone with an internet connection (or they could ask us for a copy).  Further, Library Branch Managers are ex-officio members of each Friends board and sit in on all our meetings, including our budget and program meetings.  
What the County is asking for is much more intrusive and would be extremely time consuming to provide.  The Library Director was asked if the County wanted to see every Costco receipt - she said yes.  At present the Branch Manager gives Friends a "wish list" that the Board reviews and usually approves in total.  In Reston we give the Library around $70,000 a year plus we help support the Herndon Library, too.  
We buy furniture and rolling carts, replace carpeting, pay for pest control, pay for speakers, buy books, support children's literacy programs, etc.  What the County wants is for us to pay for big ticket items on the County level - items they identify that may or may not fit with our by-laws.  
The debate over the MOU has been painful and frustrating.  
All we have ever asked is that they treat us as equal partners in the MOU (which we are) and sit down and discuss areas of concern.  For over a year they have refused, instead holding "meetings" where we are told what they have already decided.  

Additional comment:

There are many specific issues of concern here as each Friends groups has its own by-laws, mission statement, volunteer base, financial resources and elected Board of Directors.  One of our major objections is the County is trying to bind all of the Friends groups into a single contract, ignoring specific concerns and treating large and very active groups the same as very small groups.  

What would be humorous if it weren't so serious is that for years we have been trying to get the County to better account for the funds we provide them.  Please remember that the flow of funds goes only in one direction - from the Friends to the County.  In Reston we don't accept any books from the Library itself - all the books we sell are donated by the community to the Friends.  We collect them, sort them, mend them, discard old or damaged volumes, categorize them, store them, price them, sell them, etc.  
ALL the value of the books (tens of thousands of books a year in Reston alone) is derived from the work of hundreds of volunteer Friends.
   
With the funds we raise we (the Fairfax Friends groups) give our Branches and the central library system hundreds of thousands of dollars a year.  As mentioned earlier, we fund everything from SAT prep courses, English as a second language, new furniture, speakers programs, children's programs, bottled water for the staff, pest control, shelving, books and e-books, book carts (surprisingly expensive), periodicals, support for libraries in rural Virginia and overseas in developing countries, and the list goes on and on.  The Library as we know it wouldn't exist without the Friends.
The Friends and the Library are equal partners in our existing MOU.  This has worked well and without problems for decades.   The County now wants to rip up the old MOU and impose a restrictive and intrusive set of requirements on us.  You might ask why the County refuses to provide to us the same level of detailed financial accountability as they are asking from us - particularly as all the money is from us to them!   All we have ever asked is to be treated as equals in developing a document that we are an equal partner to.  A little appreciation for all we do might be nice too, but we'll settle for equal treatment.
Dennis Hays
Chairman, Fairfax Library Advocates





Falls Church Patch: Fairfax County to Evict Friends of Libraries

https://patch.com/virginia/fallschurch/fairfax-county-evict-friends-libraries

Fairfax County is in the process of evicting the Library Friends from several library branches.

The County demands that all library Friends sign a new contract which many feel violates our consciences, goes against the advice of our legal counsel, and tramples our rights as independent non profit organizations.

Library Friends work with the County.
Library Friends do not work for the County.

But the County has been determined to ram through a new "Memorandum of Understanding" contract which would put the library Friends in an inferior position.

Several library Friends groups have asked to meet with the County to discuss reasonable changes/modifications to the MOU that would make it more fair to library Friends.
But the County - through library Director Jessica Hudson and library board Chair Miriam Smolen - has been completely unwilling to consider Friends concerns or make ANY changes to the MOU approved by a divided library board earlier this year.

Instead, library Friends are being bullied and threatened with eviction if they do not sign a contract they are not comfortable with.

Library Friends have been given a deadline of July 31 to sign away their rights or be thrown out.
Such a "my way or the highway" approach is unbelievable being directed at volunteers who have served their various library branches for decades and donated millions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of volunteer hours to support library collections, facilities, programs, staff, grounds and other needs.

It is not too late for the County to reconsider this wholly destructive and counterproductive approach and to start treating the library Friends as valued partners instead of problems needing to be crushed and brought to heel.

If this attack on library Friends troubles you please let those who can make a difference know : County Board Chair Sharon Bulova sharon.bulova@fairfaxcounty.gov , County Executive Bryan Hill Bryan.Hill@fairfaxcounty.gov , Library Board Chair Miriam Smolen miriam.smolen@fairfaxcounty.gov , Library Director Jessica Hudson jessica.hudson@fairfaxcounty.gov







Saturday, June 23, 2018

Library and Library Friends Clash over Finances

Article from the Fairfax Times.

Library Friends to be evicted from their branches at the end of July.

"Libraries as you know them would collapse if the Friends went away."  Quote from library advocate, Dennis Hays.


Read full article here.

http://www.fairfaxtimes.com/articles/fairfax-county-public-library-and-friends-of-the-library-clash/article_126a887a-7639-11e8-9cc5-474386ef6595.html











Saturday, June 16, 2018

Library Friends to be Evicted from their Branches in July



Article from the Annandale blog.



Library Friends groups are engaged in a bitter dispute with the administrators of the Fairfax County Public Libraries (FCPL), who they say are trying to control their finances and are threatening to kick them out of the library if they don’t sign a memorandum of understanding (MOU).

 The biggest point of contention in the MOU, adopted by the Library Board of Trustees in January, is a provision requiring Friends groups to turn over all their financial records to the FCPL.   

Friends groups believe the MOU is one-sided and say they would sign if they have a chance to make some modifications – but they’ve told they either have to sign it as is or be evicted. “We’re being told it’s our way or the highway,” says Charles Keener of the Friends of the Tysons-Pimmit Regional Library.

The Tysons Friends group, which has not signed the MOU, passed out flyers at its book sale earlier this month stating, “this may be our final book sale.”

The Friends of the George Mason, Reston, Centreville, Thomas Jefferson, and Kingstowne libraries also have not signed the MOU.

According to FCPL Director Jessica Hudson, the Kings Park, Dolly Madison, Martha Washington, Lorton, and City of Fairfax libraries have signed.

The Friends of Woodrow Wilson Library have also signed the MOU, reports Pat Jack of the Friends group. “We’re very small potatoes; this MOU really is aimed at the larger libraries that make a lot of money. We felt we could live with it. We thought about disbanding but felt we couldn’t do it to the staff.”

“It was not handled well by the trustees,” Jack says. “They tend to dictate and not collaborate.”

Keener believes some Friends are waiting to see if they are actually going to be evicted before signing.

Hudson says she hopes all of the Friends will eventually sign the MOU by July 31 but “we haven’t set a firm deadline.” If any Friends groups refuse to sign “we would work toward dissolution of our partnership,” she says, which means the Friends group would be “removed from the library space” and could no longer use the library name.

Lack of compromise

“If they treated us as equals, all of the issues could be resolved,” says Dennis Hays, chair of Fairfax Library Advocates. “We could probably hash it out in an hour or two. It is baffling why the county is antagonizing a group that has been so helpful to the library system.”

“If the friends were to go away, the ability of the library to serve the public would be severely impacted,” Hayes says.

Library Friends are volunteers, and many of them seniors. They put in countless hours supporting their local library branch and collectively raise hundreds of thousands of dollars a year – mostly from book sales – for library programs, landscaping, furniture, and much more. George Mason Friends pays for the countywide summer reading program.

Keener accuses Hudson of “dictating, threatening, and bullying, instead of being willing to compromise.” There has been a “great deal of mistrust, anger and sense of disrespect throughout the process,” he wrote in an email to County Executive Bryan Hill. “How is it going to look when they send marshals to throw out little old ladies who sell books?”

Hudson brushes aside the criticism, insisting “many Friends groups had an opportunity to have their feedback taken into account.”

There have been many meetings on the MOU, representatives of Friends groups acknowledge, but they say they aren’t being listened to.

“Every effort by Friends to offer an alternative MOU was completely rebuffed,” Keener says, and Friends’ request to have FCPL adopt a model MOU from the American Library Association was ignored.

Friends have also pointed to the county’s plan to use separate MOUs for friends groups that support Fairfax County parks and suggested FCPL do the same for library Friends.

According to Hudson, the library Friends groups generally have the same missions and do the same activities, so “having the same overarching document makes a lot of sense,” while the park friends groups are more varied.

Money grab?

The single biggest point of contention is the provision in the MOU calling for Friends to turn over detailed financial records to Fairfax County, despite the lack of evidence of any wrongdoing.

“We are fine with providing the same basic financial summaries we file with the Feds and which are presented in our treasurer reports at our board meetings and given to the branch manager,” Keener says. “But the director has told groups that they must provide copies of every receipt and copies of their actual bank records.”

Keener finds it especially insulting that “they are asking us to turn in every Costco receipt.”

“The concern is that some of the friends have reserves, and it appears the county would like to make use of them,” Hays says. “We literally give millions of dollars to the county.”

A lawyer specializing in nonprofit law hired by several Friends groups told them “the county has no legal right to demand such detailed internal records from a legally recognized independent nonprofit entity,” Keener notes.

“Throughout this process, we have not been treated as an equal party to a mutual agreement,” he says. “And now we are being outright bullied and threatened if we dare to uphold our legal rights and follow our conscience.”

“As a county taxpayer I am beyond angry to see this disrespect and abuse directed toward citizens who have given selflessly of their time for decades,” Keener says. “This is truly Big Brother run amok.”

Hudson defends the need for more financial information. “The library board feels strongly that it’s part of their fiduciary responsibility to provide transparency around monetary issues,” she says. “Friends want more transparency, too. We will provide them more information on how libraries use their money.”   

Hays and Keener would like to see the Board of Supervisors step in and resolve the issue. “The optics of having the friends goose-stepped out of the library is something the supervisors don’t want to visualize,” Hayes says.

 Community center

Kathy Kaplan, a longtime advocate of the libraries, believes the current conflict with the Friends is an extension of previous attacks on the library system. That includes attempts to slash the FCPL budget,  the “beta plan” in 2013 to restructure how the branches operate, and the systematic effort to throw out thousands of books to make more space. 

The number of library books has been cut to 2.15 million, down from 3 million in 2004, Kaplan says, and FCPL is purchasing very few nonfiction books for adults, and almost no science, history, or philosophy books. Kaplan suspects the FCPL’s ultimate goal is to turn libraries into human services centers or community centers.

Hays notes the libraries already do a lot of community projects, such as bringing in guest speakers, hosting community groups in meeting rooms, and organizing children’ programs. But “turning the buildings into community centers with books along one wall is not what a library is.”

When asked about her vision for the library system, Hudson said libraries are not going to become community centers. “We are more of a community hub, with computer access and programming for children and adults,” she says. “We are continuing to meet baseline services – checking out books and reading programs for children, for example – and will build on that.”

Library advocates aren’t buying it. “This is part of a radical rightwing effort to destroy educational institutions in our state,” Kaplan says. “We need to have a functioning library that provides information for the public.”














Friday, August 4, 2017

Letter from Dennis Hays to Fairfax County Friends of the Library



"If we don't hang together we will surely all hang separately"    .               
                    Benjamin Franklin, America's first Friend of a Library


Dear Friends: For decades the Friends and the County have enjoyed a cooperative and mutually respectful relationship to the great benefit of the Fairfax Library system and its patrons.  The Friends have given freely and generously of their time and expertise to make our Libraries a more welcoming and efficient destination for the entire community.  Our contributions include hundreds of volunteers, thousands of uncompensated hours and hundreds of thousands of dollars of direct financial support each year.  

Given all of this, you would think the County would would be eager to work with the Friends to further strengthen and intensify this relationship.  Sadly, and from my perspective inexplicably, this isn't the case.  The new MOU proposal being put forward by the County is, if anything, worse than the original version.  Have we done something to warrant being threatened and insulted?  The County's MOU proposal will steal the independence and sap the efficiency of every Friends Group.  

The County has asked us to "update" the individual MOUs the Friends work under.  No problem with this request, but shouldn't the objective of such an effort be to strengthen the Friends so that we can even better serve the Library?  Shouldn't the Trustees, who technically are our co-equal partners in this first sit down with us and explain what they are trying to accomplish?  (Note: I know the MOUs are with the Trustees but every indication is that this is being directed by the County Library Administration, not the Trustees themselves.   If anyone has evidence to the contrary, please let me know.)   

The County's current MOU proposals are ill considered, inappropriately intrusive and demeaning.  The concerns of various Friends groups were clearly and loudly expressed at the May 30th meeting, but have been ignored.  Before anything else, there are a number of things we can do right away to try to rebuild the cooperative and mutually respectful relationship we - and they - need.  The following are actions already being taken by different Friends Groups.  

1.  Insist on a meeting with your Trustee.  Request an explanation for the County's actions and ask your Trustee to support their Friends;
2.  Go in person to see your Supervisor and/or their staff and alert them to the damage the Library Administration is causing to their volunteer base;
3.  Inform local media about the issue;
4. Send multiple members to the County's MOU meetings (these are public meetings, the County has no right to set an arbitrary limit on who can attend);  
5.  As each Friends Group has its own unique situation and concerns, request the Trustees schedule an additional meeting at your branch to discuss your specific issues;
6.  The County's proposals are all take with no give.  Insist on adding to the agenda items of concern to you and your Group (see examples below);
7. Maintain a firm and absolute line against bureaucratic overreach.  The County has no legal, ethical or operational right to dictate how an independent 501 (c) 3 organization conducts its affairs.  This is a slippery slope issue - there can be no give on this without endangering everything.  
County's Information Sheet:

The Information sheet provided in advance of the next meetings has little material different from the proposal given on May 30th.  A few quick thoughts:

Sections 1, 3, 4, 6 and 8 are generally already spelled out in the existing MOUs.  

Section 2 erroneously states all Friends Groups must register with the Virginia State Corporation Commission.  One Friends Group researched this and found there is no such general requirement.  This section should be deleted.  

Section 5 deals with insurance and is a significant departure from the standard practice of past decades.  The County needs to provide copies of the "County Volunteer Insurance Program" and provide context as to who this does and doesn't cover.  It is not clear that all (any) Groups need this.

Section 7 is unacceptable in its entirety.  The County itself states in section 1 "The Friends are independent, separate entities apart from the Library Board of Trustees and the Fairfax County Public Library".  No need for a long discussion of this - if the County can't provide a legal basis for dictating or controlling the internal operations of an independent 501 (c) 3 organization, this is off the table.  

Section 9 is the same as 7.

Section 10 is potentially devastating to all Friends Groups.  What exactly is the County proposing here?  Are we going to be charged to provide a free service to the County?  If so, how much?  What will this do to our ability to donate to the Library (as opposed to throwing money into the General Fund)?  The County needs to provide specific information about their intentions before this goes any further.    
  


Additions to the Agenda:

As noted above, we are fully entitled to bring up our own issues for discussion in any review of the MOUs.  The following are illustrative, each Group may have its own Items to propose. 

Ongoing Sales:
On request, each branch will provide sufficient space in a prominent area of the library for a display of books and materials for ongoing sales.
The County will provide, on a semi-annual basis, a detailed account of how funds received from ongoing sales have been spent and how this directly benefits the Library System.
Trustee Meetings:
A representative of the Friends will be invited to speak at the beginning of each Trustee meeting.  
Space:
Each Friends group will be provided sufficient space in their respective Library for collecting, sorting, storing and preparing books for sale.   The Library will provide adequate space for holding sales.  The Friends will be given first priority on the use of space; space may be reserved up to a year in advance.  
Financial:
The County will compile and publish an annual report detailing all the contributions made by Fairfax Friends Groups over the previous year.  The report will include an estimate of the funds saved by relying on Friends volunteers rather than paid staff.   
At the request of Library Management, over the years the Friends have assumed responsibility for services that strictly belong to the County.  The Friends have freely and cheerfully assumed this responsibility.  These services include paying for sprinkler systems, pest control, gardening and landscaping, funding volunteer appreciation events (!), etc.  The County will assume responsibility for and the cost of all such activities.  The County will reimburse the Friends for the cost of such activities incurred over the past five years.   
In keeping with the point immediately above, the County will certify that no funds provided by the Friends will be used to offset expenses properly attributable to the County.  Exceptions may be made with the express authorization of the appropriate Friends Group.  
The Friends provide funds for the purchase of books and materials and physical property with the understanding that the County will be a good steward of such donations.  The County will annually certify the donations continue to be used for their specific purpose.  The County will notify the Friends as to the final disposition of any major donation.    

Best regards, Dennis   

Dennis K. Hays
Chairman
Fairfax Library Advocates

Thursday, August 3, 2017

Reston Regional Library Redevelopment, Request for Proposal



The rebuilding of Reston Regional Library in Reston Town Center will be part of a Public Private Partnership sponsored by Fairfax County.

This is a link to the Request for Proposal:

http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/dpwes/restontowncenternorth/rfp2000001682-1b.pdf